I examined possible differences of the web site, geographical area, and you can ethnicity playing with t-evaluation and you may analysis out-of variance (ANOVA) into the LIWC group proportions. Towards a few websites, half dozen of your several t-evaluation had been significant regarding the adopting the kinds: first-person just one [t(3998) = ?5.61, p Second Desk dos to have means, simple deviations, and you will contrasts anywhere between cultural organizations). Contrasts found high differences when considering White and all sorts of most other cultural teams during the five of six high ANOVAs. Thus, i incorporated ethnicity since the an effective dummy-coded covariate within the analyses (0 = White colombian women dating sites, step 1 = All other cultural organizations).
Of your a dozen ANOVA evaluating regarding geographic part, merely a few was basically significant (members of the family and you can confident feelings). As distinctions were not technically significant, we failed to believe geographical part into the then analyses.
Regularity out-of term have fun with goes without saying inside the descriptive statistics (come across Desk step one) and you can via word-clouds. The definition of-affect approach depicts by far the most commonly used conditions along the whole decide to try plus in all the a long time. The expression-affect program automatically excludes particular terms, along with stuff (an excellent, and you can, the) and prepositions (so you’re able to, having, on). The remainder stuff words try scaled sizes in accordance with their volume, doing an user-friendly portrait really common content words across the fresh new decide to try ( Wordle, 2014).
Contour step one shows the fresh 20 most typical articles terminology utilized in the complete try. As well as get noticed, probably the most commonly used terminology was love (looking for the 67% regarding pages), such as for example (lookin during the 62% out of pages), looking (appearing from inside the 55% out of pages), and you may anyone (searching inside fifty% away from users). Ergo, the best conditions had been equivalent all over age groups.
Figure 2 suggests the next 31 most common posts terms into the the brand new youngest and earliest age range. By removing the initial 20 popular posts conditions along side test, i illustrate heterogeneity on dating profiles. In the next 30 terms towards the youngest age bracket, raised percentage terms and conditions integrated get (36% away from pages on the youngest generation), go (33% out of users from the youngest age group), and you will functions (28% out-of profiles in the youngest age group). Alternatively, the latest earliest age bracket got high proportions out of terms and conditions such as for instance travelling (31% out of pages in the earliest age group), great (24% off profiles about earliest age bracket), and you will relationships (19% regarding pages about oldest age group).
Next 29 popular terms and conditions throughout the youngest and you will earliest age communities (just after subtracting the fresh 20 popular terms out-of Contour step 1).
To evaluate hypotheses, the fresh new portion of terms and conditions from the matchmaking reputation that suit for every single LIWC category offered while the dependent parameters into the regressions. I tested age and you can gender because separate variables and additionally modifying having website and you can ethnicity.
Theory step 1: More mature many years would be associated with a top percentage of terms regarding the following the classes: first-individual plural pronouns, relatives, household members, health, and you can positive feelings.
Conclusions mostly served Theory step 1 (see Table 2). Four of one’s four regressions revealed a serious head impact to possess decades, in a way that given that chronilogical age of this new character creator enhanced, the latest part of words on category enhanced regarding pursuing the categories: first-person plural, family members, fitness, and you may positive emotion. We located zero extreme age effect towards proportion out-of terms throughout the family members category.
a good Gender: 0 (female) and you will step 1 (male). b Site: The two websites have been dictomously coded because step one and you can 0. c Ethnicity: 0 (White) and you will 1 (Cultural otherwise racial fraction).
good Gender: 0 (female) and you can 1 (male). b Site: The 2 other sites have been dictomously coded just like the step one and 0. c Ethnicity: 0 (White) and you may 1 (Ethnic otherwise racial fraction).